What Verdent is
Verdent calls itself “your AI technical co-founder”. You describe what you want to build in plain language and it plans the work, writes the code, tests it and iterates until the thing runs.
It is not a chat that returns snippets. It is an autonomous agent: its core product, the Manager, splits a goal into subtasks, puts them on a Kanban board and works through them without you hovering over it.
The company behind it is Verdent AI, Inc., and the oldest material on their blog is from October 2025, so this is a young product.
Plans and pricing
| Plan | Price | Credits/mo |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 100 (7-day trial) |
| Lite | $5/mo | Eco Mode only, no credits |
| Starter | $19/mo | 480 (320 base + 160 temporary bonus) |
| Pro | $59/mo | 1,500 (1,000 + 500 bonus) |
| Max | $179/mo | 4,500 (3,000 + 1,500 bonus) |
| Teams | $20/user/mo | 480 per user |
Monthly billing only. There is no annual discount, which is unusual in this category.
The advertised credits include a temporary bonus. The real base amounts are 320, 1,000 and 3,000. Verdent promises 15 days’ notice before removing it, but if you subscribe expecting 480 credits, sooner or later you will have 320.
Subscription credits do not roll over. Whatever you do not spend each month, you lose. Credits bought separately as top-ups never expire. Top-ups run from $20 for 340 credits to $200 for 3,400, at a stated $0.059 per credit that we verified in our own panel.
What it actually costs to use
This is what you will not find on their site, and the reason we tested it with a paid account instead of repeating the brochure.
Hover over any model in Verdent and it tells you how many “model requests” fit into 100 credits. For Opus 5 it says about 84, which sounds like a bit over one credit per request.
The reality is very different. Straight from our billing panel:
| Operation | Model | Tokens | Credits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Generate a video | dreamina-seedance-2-0 | 650,700 | 77.44 |
| Agent task | claude-opus-5 | 4,279,746 | 62.32 |
| Agent task | claude-opus-5 | 2,428,637 | 37.78 |
| Agent task | claude-opus-5 | 683,987 | 8.16 |
| Generate an image | gpt-image-2 | 6,736 | 2.26 |
| Improve a prompt | claude-haiku-4-5 | ~9,000 | 0.20 |
Every agent run recorded in billing cost between 8 and 62 credits, averaging around 34. Not 1.2. And this is not a misreading: a single log line spans between 680,000 and 4.3 million tokens, far too much for one model call. The fine print on their own panel explains it: “complex tasks may generate multiple internal requests.”
In practice: 480 Starter credits buy about 14 agent runs a month, not the 403 “requests” the interface implies.
The app’s metric is not lying, it measures model requests. The problem is that a model request is not one of your tasks, and nothing in the interface says so except that footnote.
One more thing their site never mentions and we confirmed in our account: failed attempts consume credits too. If you dislike a result and ask for a redo, you pay twice.
Our Starter plan ran out in one day
We built a landing page, asked for four design variants, generated about fifteen images and nine video clips. One day of work, nothing resembling heavy professional use. The full monthly plan was gone.
A single agent run cost us 62.32 credits, 13% of the entire monthly plan in one command, and video generation swallowed roughly half of all visible spend.
It is not that the tool works badly. It works too well: the agent runs without brakes and the counter falls at the same speed.
Eco Mode is the safety net, and it works
Here is the part that redeems the picture, and we found it by hitting zero.
Verdent has a second system, Eco Mode, that runs outside the credit system. We tested it with an empty balance and the app kept working normally. The model picker says it plainly next to each compatible model: “doesn’t use credits.”
Instead of a balance it uses time quotas: a rolling 5-hour window and a weekly cap, both visible in the dashboard.
Available models are Kimi K3, Kimi K2.7 Code, Kimi K2.6, DeepSeek-V4-Flash, DeepSeek-V4-Pro, GPT-5.6 Luna, GLM-5.2 and MiniMax M3. The top tier is excluded: no Opus 5, no Fable 5, no GPT-5.6 Sol.
With a zero balance we asked it to build another complete landing page using Kimi K3. It came out just as fast, and the billing log confirms it without ambiguity: every line tagged Eco Mode, 0 credits.
But Eco Mode only covers code. With no credits left, image and video generation stop working entirely.
That still makes the $5/mo Lite plan, which is Eco Mode only, the cheapest serious entry point among the major coding agents.
Video generation eats the budget
Verdent advertises video generation as just another feature. It is not: it is by far the most expensive operation.
We generated nine clips: seven of ten seconds and two of five. The generations we could read individually cost between 25.81 and 77.44 credits each. With 480 Starter credits, counting video alone, you do not reach a dozen clips a month.
And it gets worse: those were not nine good videos, they were nine attempts. Every redo was billed as a new generation.
If you came to Verdent looking for a video tool, this is not its territory.
Platforms and limits
The main way to use Verdent is the desktop app, available for macOS 11+ and Windows 10/11. There is also Verdent Cloud in the browser, plus extensions for VS Code and JetBrains.
There is no Linux build, which excludes a sizeable part of its natural audience. There is also no CLI, though with BYOA you can connect external agents like Codex or Claude Code.
Privacy: read this before feeding it client code
All infrastructure and data sit exclusively in the United States, on AWS.
In your favour: Verdent does not access or index your repositories by default. Code indexing is something you enable explicitly, and if you do, its privacy policy says what is stored are embeddings for semantic search, not plaintext code, and unused embeddings expire automatically.
Against it, and worth saying plainly: your data can be used to train models if Privacy Mode is off. Check before working with code that is not yours.
Its SOC 2 and ISO/IEC 42001 certifications are in progress, not achieved.
Verdict
Verdent is the most autonomous of the coding agents we have tested, and the quality of what it produces is genuinely high. The billing transparency is better than anyone else’s in the category, which is ironic given that the transparency is what reveals how fast it spends.
Score it honestly and the weak spot is value for money, not capability. Start on Lite at $5 with Eco Mode, switch the preset away from its most expensive default, forget about generating video, and only move to credits when you know what your real workload costs.
Verdent provided a subscription so we could measure real consumption, and this article contains affiliate links. The tests and conclusions are our own.
👉 Verdent vs Cursor vs Copilot vs Claude Code
👉 The best AI coding assistants in 2026
Community rating
Affiliate link - no extra cost to you